Services

Eleven focused engagements, one integrated practice

Every Contiqa engagement is delivered through one of the service lines below — from a single UAE e-invoicing gap assessment to full ERP tax architecture and ongoing tax governance. Each page sets out the scope, the deliverables, and why Contiqa is positioned to deliver it.

Tax Advisory — VAT, Corporate Tax & Transfer Pricing

Technically grounded positions built to hold when the authority arrives

Tax advice that stops at a legal opinion isn’t finished — it has to survive contact with the ERP, the master data, and the auditor. Most advisory engagements hand over a memo and leave the translation into system logic to someone else, which is exactly where positions that looked sound on paper start to fail in practice.

Learn more →

Tax Compliance Support

Ongoing filing, review, and authority engagement — not a one-off project

Implementation projects end. Compliance obligations don’t. Once a mandate goes live, someone still has to review every filing period, chase down exceptions, and respond when the authority writes back — and that work quietly determines whether everything built during implementation actually holds up.

Learn more →

Tax Operating Model & RACI Design

Rebuilding the tax function around technology, not around a filing calendar

Real-time tax compliance breaks operating models built for periodic filing. If the tax function’s structure, RACI, and processes are still designed around a quarterly return cycle, no amount of ERP configuration will make the function itself keep pace with transaction-speed obligations.

Learn more →

Tax Governance & Continuous Controls

Governance built into the operating rhythm, not bolted on after the filing

A compliance dashboard showing every control as green tells you filings went out on time. It doesn’t tell you the underlying data was correct. Under continuous, transaction-level authority visibility, that gap between process adherence and data accuracy is where audit exposure actually lives.

Learn more →

UAE E-Invoicing Consulting

End-to-end MD 243 / MD 244 implementation advisory for Phase 1 and Phase 2

Phase 1 businesses (AED 50 million or more in annual revenue) must appoint an Accredited Service Provider by 30 October 2026 and go live by 1 January 2027. Phase 2 covers every remaining VAT-registered business from 1 July 2027. Most organisations treat this as an IT integration project. It is a tax, technology, and data governance problem happening simultaneously — and the gaps that surface after go-live are almost always ones a purely technical rollout never tested for.

Learn more →

UAE E-Invoicing Gap Assessment

A structured readiness diagnostic before you commit to an ASP or a build

Most gap assessments answer one question: can this system technically transmit an invoice? That misses the gaps that actually cause post-go-live failures — master data quality, process ownership, and the schematron rules a business’s current data would fail against, not just the fields it’s missing.

Learn more →

PINT-AE Readiness Advisory

Field-by-field, rule-by-rule preparation for PINT-AE BIS v1.0.2 compliance

PINT-AE is not a print format — it’s a UBL 2.1 XML specification with 51 mandatory fields and 114 schematron business rules, several governing UAE-specific BTAE extension fields that don’t exist in standard ERP invoice output. Getting this mapping wrong doesn’t fail quietly; it fails at ASP submission, after the transaction has already happened.

Learn more →

Tax Technology Consulting

ERP tax architecture, automation, and system design for real-time compliance

Tax rules that live in policy documents and spreadsheets don’t scale to real-time, transaction-level compliance. The rules have to become executable system logic — configured correctly, tested against every transaction type, and maintained as legislation changes. That’s a systems design problem as much as a tax one.

Learn more →

Tax Data Governance

Master data remediation and governance for tax-correct-at-source systems

Missing PEPPOL Participant Identifiers, placeholder TRN values, incorrect emirate subdivision codes — master data problems are the most common cause of e-invoicing and VAT compliance failures, and they’re set months or years before a return is ever filed. Fixing them retrospectively is a correction exercise. Fixing them at the point of product or customer setup is governance.

Learn more →

SAP & Oracle E-Invoicing Implementation

PINT-AE configuration for SAP Document and Reporting Compliance and Oracle e-invoicing cloud

Neither SAP nor Oracle generates UAE-specific BTAE extension fields natively. Both require schematron validation configuration and ASP integration before a single compliant invoice can be transmitted — and the configuration path differs meaningfully between the two platforms.

Learn more →

In-House Fusion Professional Programme

On-the-job development inside your own systems, so the capability stays after the project ends

Every implementation leaves an architecture behind. The harder question is who owns it once the consultants leave: who understands the determination logic, who can defend a position the system produced, and who decides what changes when the next mandate arrives. Real-time tax and AI-enabled finance both move execution into systems and leave accountability with people. The people need to be developed for that, inside the systems they will answer for.

Learn more →

Not sure which service fits your mandate?

Get in touch →